< prev | next >

Accuracy

Accuracy is measured as the closeness of a value to a desired value.

One example of accuracy measurement is the distance of values in relation to the mean of a probability density function:

Use Cases

For details on true/false positives/negatives see: Confusion Matrix.

The Accuracy Paradox

The accuracy paradox can occur when a model with high accuracy has low predictive value. For example, a model trained to predict financial fraud using training data with a very high proportion of non-fraud examples might have high accuracy in training results, but not be good at identifying fraud in real world predictions. In these cases, measures of Precision and Recall are better indicators of actual prediction accuracy.

Black Box Models and Inaccurate Results

Black Box refers to systems and Machine Learning models, such as Deep Learning Artificial Neural Networks, that can produce results not traceable through modeling processes.

Black Box model inaccurate results can be caused by factors such as:

  • insufficient model training data

  • malicious prediction data manipulation

  • edge cases in prediction inputs

An example is an image recognition model that produces an inaccurate classification due to a small object in front of an actual target object.

For an in-depth analysis related to computer vision, see: Analysis of Explainers of Black Box Deep Neural Networks for Computer Vision: A Survey

Generative Models Accuracy

There are several methods for evaluating the accuracy and effectiveness of generative models. When evaluating generative models, it's often best to use a combination of these metrics, as each captures different aspects of model performance. Additionally, the choice of metrics should be tailored to the specific task and domain of the generative model.

Remember that no single metric is perfect, and the interpretation of these metrics can be nuanced. It's important to consider the limitations and biases of each metric when drawing conclusions about model performance.

ROUGE Score

ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation) is a set of metrics commonly used to evaluate the quality of summaries generated by language models, including Large Language Models (LLMs). By using ROUGE scores, researchers and developers can quantitatively assess how well an LLM's generated summaries capture the key information from the source text, as compared to human-written summaries. However, it's important to use ROUGE in conjunction with other evaluation methods for a more complete understanding of LLM performance in summarization tasks.

Purpose

ROUGE measures the similarity between machine-generated summaries and human-written reference summaries. It's particularly useful for assessing text summarization, machine translation, and other text generation tasks.

Types of ROUGE

There are several variants of ROUGE, including:

  • ROUGE-N: Measures overlap of n-grams (contiguous sequences of n words) between the generated and reference summaries.

  • ROUGE-L: Based on the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) between the generated and reference texts.

  • ROUGE-S: Considers skip-bigrams, allowing for gaps between matched words.

How it Works

ROUGE compares the generated summary against one or more reference summaries, calculating various scores based on word overlap and sequence matching.

Key Metrics

  • Precision: Proportion of n-grams in the generated summary that also appear in the reference summary.

  • Recall: Proportion of n-grams in the reference summary that also appear in the generated summary.

  • F1-score: Harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a balanced measure.

Interpretation

ROUGE scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating greater similarity to the reference summary. A score of 1 would mean perfect match, while 0 indicates no overlap.

Limitations

While useful, ROUGE has limitations:

  • It focuses on lexical overlap, potentially missing semantic similarities.

  • It doesn't account for fluency or grammatical correctness.

  • Multiple reference summaries can lead to more robust evaluation.

Usage in LLM Evaluation

When evaluating LLMs, researchers often use ROUGE alongside other metrics and human evaluation to get a comprehensive assessment of summary quality.

Implementation

ROUGE can be implemented using libraries like `rouge-score` in Python, making it relatively straightforward to incorporate into evaluation pipelines for LLMs.

Fréchet Inception Distance (FID)

FID improves upon the Inception Score by comparing the statistics of generated images to real images. It calculates the distance between the feature representations of real and generated images using a pre-trained Inception v3 model. Lower FID scores indicate more similar distributions and thus better quality generated images.

Precision and Recall

These metrics assess how well the generated distribution covers the real data distribution (recall) and how much of the generated distribution is contained within the real distribution (precision). They help measure both the quality and diversity of generated samples.

BLEU Score

Primarily used for text generation tasks, BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy) compares generated text to reference texts by measuring n-gram overlap. It's commonly used in machine translation and text summarization evaluation.

Perplexity

Often used for language models, perplexity measures how well a probability model predicts a sample. Lower perplexity indicates better performance.

Human Evaluation

Qualitative assessment by human judges remains a crucial method, especially for creative tasks. This can involve rating generated samples, comparing them to real samples, or assessing their quality and diversity.

Task-specific Metrics

Depending on the application, you might use domain-specific metrics. For example, in image generation, you might evaluate sharpness, color fidelity, or semantic consistency.

Nearest Neighbors

This approach compares generated samples to their nearest neighbors in the real dataset to assess both quality and mode collapse (lack of diversity).

Discriminator Scores

In GANs, the discriminator's ability to distinguish real from generated samples can be used as a metric, though this should be used cautiously as it can be misleading.

Reconstruction Error

For models like autoencoders, measuring how well the model can reconstruct input data can be a useful metric.

References